NEW MAP

CivOS

V0.10
DraftStatus
0Sources
0Risks
A flight simulator for real-world decisions

Test-fly a strategy before it meets the real world.

Bring CivOS an uncertain idea. It builds the flight plan—goal, people, constraints, evidence, and time horizons—then specialist Agents simulate pressure, failure modes, and possible outcomes before you commit.

Describe your decision, answer one useful question, and review the analysis. Detailed setup is optional.
01Test a strategy

Turn a rough proposal into a reversible experiment.

02See who is affected

Surface costs, benefits, missing voices, and conflicts.

03Explore across time

Compare immediate feasibility with longer-term effects.

Live agent run · observed workflowPreparing decision traceUnavailable tools are marked explicitly. Stage times reflect this live run.
0.0sReady
Manager orchestrationDecision Council
Waiting for specialist outputs
ManagerWaiting to synthesize

Specialist results must arrive before the Manager can conclude.

EventSelect a trace node
Input
—
Tool / method
—
Output
—
Stage time
—
Voice DeliberationTalk through the decision

Speak naturally. CivOS will extract the goal, constraints, and affected stakeholders—not hold a voice chat.

Add your evidence or notes
Multimodal civic input0 sources

Attach real working material. CivOS classifies each item and marks it as User-provided in the decision graph.

PDFs and images use multimodal analysis when OpenAI is connected. Up to 2.8 MB per file. Binary files are not saved in Decision Memory. Export Excel sheets as CSV first.

Add a decision to create an AI-assisted draft.

Decision briefNot saved yet

Your decision needs an AI analysis

Next reversible step

Strongest objection

Evidence gaps

What could change this decision

Why this direction

A reversible pilot creates evidence before a larger commitment.

Key assumptions
  • The problem is urgent enough to justify a pilot.
  • An owner and success metric can be agreed.
Counterpoint

A pilot can still consume trust and attention if the decision criteria are unclear.

Guardrail ReceiptTrust Receipt
Pending analysis
  • No unsupported sources presented as verified
  • Personally sensitive data excluded
  • External actions require approval
  • Minority-impact check completed
  • Unresolved assumptions disclosed
Receipt not issued
Visible safety evidenceGuardrail Receipt
Command paletteWhat do you want to inspect?⌘K / Ctrl+K
Press Esc to close
Model connectionHow should CivOS run?

Managed AI uses the deployment's Gateway or provider credentials. A personal OpenAI key is optional and stays only in this open page.

Managed connection selected.
Technical deep diveTrace / Eval DashboardNo trace
Span timelineObserved wall-clock durations
GuardrailsReceipt results
Eval rubric0/8 checks
Sensitive trace payloads are excluded; dashboard shows operational metadata only.
Human Approval Gate · External action boundary CivOS recommends consulting affected residents before finalizing this plan.

Approve preparation of a decision-specific draft?

No outreach will be prepared or sent until you decide.
Issue Your decision map
Continue exploringNot ready for a pilot or full rollout
0 of 5 checks complete
Evidence strengthLow
Unknowns3 unresolved
ReversibilityEasy
Decision readinessExplore
Disagreement0 material conflicts
More
Decision briefUntitled decision

Record your choice separately from the AI suggestion. Changes are saved on this device.

Full analysis text
Inside CivOS · V0.10
Understand the decision before you commit

One question.
A clearer way forward.

Explore what could happen, who would be affected, and what evidence could change your mind. You stay in control of the decision.

From uncertainty to a decision brief

Four stages. Every result open to review.
  1. 01Your context

    Frame the question

    Describe what you’re considering. Add a useful clarification, constraints, or supporting material.

    Start withA decision worth testing
  2. 02Independent perspectives

    Test the assumptions

    AI selects relevant roles to explore incentives, practical limits, and opposing views.

    Affected peopleDelivery teamDecision owner
    Bring togetherFindings, evidence & disagreements
  3. 03Possible outcomes

    Explore what changes

    Compare three scenarios, their drivers, and the benefits or burdens for different people.

    UpsideMixedDownside
    Watch forSignals that change the outlook
  4. 04Your review

    Choose a next step

    Review the recommendation, strongest objection, and evidence gaps before deciding what to do.

    Take awayA brief you can question & revisit

Evidence stays visible

Tool-backed claims, user material, and unresolved assumptions are labeled separately.

Scenarios aren’t forecasts

Explore possibilities and warning signals. Optional model estimates are not calibrated probabilities.

Your decisions stay revisitable

Save separate decisions in this browser, test new conditions, and compare what changed.